fips/docs/design/fips-intro.md

FIPS: Free Internetworking Peering System

What is FIPS?

FIPS is a self-organizing mesh network that can operate natively over a variety of physical and logical media, such as local area networks, Bluetooth, serial links, or the existing internet as an overlay. The long-term goal is infrastructure that can function alongside or ultimately replace dependence on the Internet itself. Systems running FIPS establish peer connections, authenticate each other, and route traffic for each other without any central authority or global topology knowledge, and allow end-to-end encrypted sessions between any two nodes regardless of how many hops separate them.

Nodes in the mesh route traffic for each other using Nostr identities (npubs) as network addresses. Applications can access the mesh through a native FIPS datagram service, or through an IPv6 adaptation layer that presents each node as an IPv6 endpoint for compatibility with existing IP-based applications.

Why FIPS?

Self-sovereign identity: FIPS nodes generate their own addresses, node IDs, and security credentials without coordination with any central authority. These identities can be long-term fixed or may be ephemeral, changed at any time. These identities are not visible to the FIPS network itself — they are used only at the application layer and for end-to-end session encryption.

Infrastructure independence: The internet depends on centralized infrastructure — ISPs, backbone providers, DNS, certificate authorities. FIPS works over any transport that can carry packets: a serial connection, onion-routed connections through Tor, local area networking, radio links between remote sites, or the existing internet as an overlay. When the internet is unavailable, unreliable, or untrusted, the mesh still works.

Privacy by design: FIPS provides secure, authenticated, and encrypted communication between any two nodes in the mesh, independent of the mix of transports used along the routed path between them. Furthermore, the mesh itself is designed to minimize metadata exposure — intermediate nodes route packets without learning the identities of the endpoints.

Zero configuration: Nodes discover each other and build routing automatically. Connect to one peer and you can reach the entire mesh. The network self-heals around failures and adapts to changing topology.

A Self-Organizing Mesh

Traditional networks are built top-down. A central authority assigns addresses, configures routing tables, provisions hardware, and manages the topology. If the authority disappears or the infrastructure fails, the network fails with it. Nodes cannot reach each other without infrastructure mediating the connection.

FIPS inverts this model. There is no central authority, no address assignment service, no routing table pushed from above. Each node generates its own identity from a cryptographic keypair. Each node independently decides which peers to connect to and which transports to use. From these local decisions alone, the network self-organizes:

• A spanning tree forms through distributed parent selection, giving every node a coordinate in the network without any node knowing the full topology
• Bloom filters propagate through gossip, so each node learns which peers can reach which destinations — again without global knowledge
• Routing decisions are made locally at each hop, using only the node's immediate peers and cached coordinate information

Each peer link and end-to-end session actively measures RTT, loss, jitter, and goodput through a lightweight in-band Metrics Measurement Protocol (MMP), providing operator visibility and a foundation for quality-aware routing.

The result is a network that builds itself from the bottom up, heals around failures automatically, and scales without central coordination. Adding a node is as simple as connecting to one existing peer — the network integrates the new node through its normal mesh protocols.

Specific Design Goals

• Nostr-native identity and cryptography — Use Nostr keypairs as node identities and leverage secp256k1, Schnorr signatures, and SHA-256
• Transport agnostic — Support overlay, shared medium, and point-to-point transports transparently
• Self-organizing — Automatic topology discovery and route optimization
• Privacy preserving — Minimize metadata leakage across untrusted links
• Resilient — Self-healing with graceful degradation

Non-goals include:

• Reliable delivery — FIPS provides a best-effort datagram service; retransmission and ordering are left to applications or higher-layer protocols
• Anonymity — Direct peers learn each other's identity; FIPS minimizes metadata exposure but is not an anonymity network like Tor
• Congestion control — FIPS measures link quality but does not implement flow control or congestion avoidance at the mesh layer

---

Protocol Architecture

FIPS is organized in three protocol layers, each with distinct responsibilities and clean service boundaries. No layer depends on the specifics of the layers above or below it — transport plugins know nothing about sessions, the routing layer knows nothing about application addressing, and applications know nothing about which physical media carry their traffic. This separation means new transports, protocol features, and application interfaces can be added independently.

Mapping to Traditional Networking

Readers familiar with the OSI model or TCP/IP networking may find it helpful to see how FIPS concepts relate to traditional layers:

Note that FMP spans what would traditionally be separate link and network layers. This is intentional — in a self-organizing mesh, the same layer that authenticates peers also makes routing decisions, because routing depends on authenticated peer state (spanning tree positions, bloom filters).

Layer Responsibilities

Transport layer: Delivers datagrams between endpoints over a specific medium. Each transport type (UDP socket, Ethernet interface, radio modem) implements the same abstract interface: send and receive datagrams, report MTU. The transport layer knows nothing about FIPS identities, routing, or encryption. It provides raw datagram delivery to FMP above.

See fips-transport-layer.md for the transport layer specification.

FIPS Mesh Protocol (FMP): Manages peer connections, authenticates peers via Noise IK handshakes, and encrypts all traffic on each link. FMP is where the mesh organizes itself — nodes exchange spanning tree announcements and bloom filters with their direct peers, and FMP makes forwarding decisions for transit traffic. FMP provides authenticated, encrypted forwarding to FSP above.

See fips-mesh-layer.md for the FMP specification and fips-mesh-operation.md for how FMP's routing and self-organization work in practice.

FIPS Session Protocol (FSP): Provides end-to-end authenticated encryption between any two nodes, regardless of how many intermediate hops separate them. FSP manages session lifecycle (setup, data transfer, teardown), caches destination coordinates for efficient routing, and handles the warmup strategy that keeps transit node caches populated. Session dispatch uses index-based routing inspired by WireGuard, enabling O(1) packet demultiplexing. FSP provides a datagram service to applications above.

See fips-session-layer.md for the FSP specification.

IPv6 adaptation layer: Sits above FSP and adapts the FIPS datagram service for unmodified IPv6 applications. Provides DNS resolution (npub → fd00::/8 address), identity cache management, MTU enforcement, and a TUN interface. This is the primary way existing applications use the FIPS mesh.

See fips-ipv6-adapter.md for the IPv6 adapter.

Node Architecture

Two application interfaces sit at the top of the stack: a native datagram API addressed by npub, and an IPv6 TUN adapter that maps npubs to fd00::/8 addresses so unmodified IP applications can use the network transparently.

The mesh routes application traffic across heterogeneous transports transparently. A packet may traverse WiFi, Ethernet, UDP/IP, and Tor links on its way from source to destination — the application never needs to know which transports are involved. Each hop is independently encrypted at the link layer, while a single end-to-end session protects the payload across the entire path.

---

Identity System

FIPS uses Nostr keypairs (secp256k1) as node identities. The public key identifies the node; the private key signs protocol messages and establishes encrypted sessions.

The public key (or its bech32-encoded npub form) is the primary means for application-layer software to identify communication endpoints. Internally, the protocol derives a node_addr (a 16-byte SHA-256 hash of the pubkey) used as the routing identifier in packet headers, and an IPv6 address derived from the node_addr for the TUN adapter. Applications use the pubkey or npub; the routing layer uses node_addr; unmodified IPv6 applications use the derived fd00::/8 address. All three are deterministically derived from the same keypair.

FIPS Identity Handling

The pubkey is the node's cryptographic identity, used in Noise IK handshakes for both link and session encryption. It is never exposed beyond the endpoints of an encrypted channel. The node_addr, a one-way SHA-256 hash truncated to 16 bytes, serves as the routing identifier in packet headers and bloom filters. Intermediate routers see only node_addrs — they can forward traffic without learning the Nostr identities of the endpoints. An observer can verify "does this node_addr belong to pubkey X?" if they already know the pubkey, but cannot enumerate communicating identities by inspecting traffic. The IPv6 address prepends fd to the first 15 bytes of the node_addr, providing a ULA overlay address for unmodified IP applications via the TUN interface.

Below the FIPS identity layer, each transport uses its own native addressing — IP:port tuples, MAC addresses, .onion identifiers. These link addresses are opaque to everything above FMP and discarded once link authentication completes.

Identity Verification

The Noise Protocol Framework mutually authenticates both peer-to-peer link connections (at FMP) and end-to-end session traffic (at FSP), proving each party controls the private key for their claimed identity.

See fips-mesh-layer.md for peer authentication and fips-session-layer.md for end-to-end session establishment.

Key rotation changes the node's identity — a new keypair produces a new node_addr and IPv6 address, requiring all sessions to be re-established. Migration mechanisms that allow a node to announce a successor key are a future consideration.

---

Two-Layer Encryption

FIPS uses independent encryption at two protocol layers:

Layer	Scope	Pattern	Purpose
FMP (Mesh)	Hop-by-hop	Noise IK	Encrypt all traffic on each peer link
FSP (Session)	End-to-end	Noise IK	Encrypt application payload between endpoints

Link Layer (Hop-by-Hop)

When two nodes establish a direct connection, they perform a Noise IK handshake. This authenticates both parties and establishes symmetric keys for encrypting all traffic on that link. Every packet between direct peers is encrypted — gossip messages, routing queries, and forwarded session datagrams alike.

The IK pattern is used because outbound connections know the peer's npub from configuration, while inbound connections learn the initiator's identity from the first handshake message.

Session Layer (End-to-End)

FIPS establishes end-to-end encrypted sessions between any two communicating nodes using Noise IK, regardless of how many hops separate them. The initiator knows the destination's npub; the responder learns the initiator's identity from the handshake — the same asymmetry as link-layer connections.

A packet from A to D through intermediate nodes B and C:

1. A encrypts payload with A↔D session key (FSP)
2. A wraps in SessionDatagram, encrypts with A↔B link key (FMP), sends to B
3. B decrypts link layer, reads destination node_addr, re-encrypts with B↔C link key, forwards to C
4. C decrypts link layer, re-encrypts with C↔D link key, forwards to D
5. D decrypts link layer, then decrypts session layer to get payload

Intermediate nodes route based on destination node_addr but cannot read session-layer payloads. Each hop strips one link encryption and applies the next — the session-layer ciphertext passes through untouched.

Both layers always apply, even between adjacent peers — a packet to a direct neighbor is still encrypted twice. This uniform model means no special cases for local vs remote destinations, and topology changes (a direct peer becomes reachable only through intermediaries) don't affect existing sessions.

See fips-mesh-layer.md for link encryption and fips-session-layer.md for session encryption.

---

Routing and Mesh Operation

Each node makes forwarding decisions using only local information — its immediate peers, their bloom filters, and cached coordinates — rather than centrally distributed routing tables or global topology knowledge. Two complementary mechanisms provide the information each node needs.

Spanning Tree: The Coordinate System

Nodes self-organize into a spanning tree through gossip — each node exchanges announcements with its direct peers and independently selects a parent. Because every node applies the same rule (prefer the root with the smallest node_addr), the network converges on a single agreed-upon root without any voting or coordination. This is the same principle behind the Spanning Tree Protocol used in Ethernet bridging since the 1980s: purely local decisions that converge to consistent global state. The resulting tree gives every node a coordinate — its path from itself to the root. Using tree coordinates for routing is adapted from Yggdrasil's Ironwood routing library.

These coordinates enable distance calculations between any two nodes: the distance is the number of hops from each node to their lowest common ancestor in the tree. This provides a metric for routing decisions without any node needing to know the full network topology.

The tree maintains itself through gossip — nodes exchange TreeAnnounce messages with their peers, propagating parent selections and ancestry chains. Changes cascade through the tree proportional to depth, not network size. If the network partitions, each segment converges to its own new root through the same process and reconverges automatically when segments rejoin.

See fips-spanning-tree.md for the tree algorithms and spanning-tree-dynamics.md for detailed convergence walkthroughs.

Bloom Filters: Candidate Selection

The spanning tree provides a coordinate system for distance-based routing, but on its own each node would only know about its immediate neighbors. Bloom filters complement the tree by distributing reachability knowledge across the entire mesh — each node learns which destinations are reachable through which peers, without any node needing a complete view of the network.

Each node's peer-advertised bloom filter is a compact, fixed-size data structure that answers one question: "can this peer possibly reach destination D?" The answer is either "no" (definitive) or "maybe" (probabilistic — false positives are possible). Because the filter size is constant regardless of how many destinations it represents, bloom filters scale efficiently as the network grows. This is candidate selection for routing — bloom filters narrow the set of peers worth considering, and the actual forwarding decision ranks those candidates by tree distance and link quality.

Filters propagate via gossip, with each node computing outbound filters by merging the filters received from its other peers (a split-horizon technique borrowed from distance-vector routing). At steady state, filters represent the entire reachable network.

See fips-bloom-filters.md for filter parameters and mathematical properties.

Every filter is computed identically regardless of link type: the outbound filter for peer Q merges this node's identity with all inbound filters except Q's (split-horizon exclusion). The protocol makes no distinction between tree parents, tree children, or mesh peers — the asymmetry visible in the diagram is a consequence of tree topology, not a different operation.

A node with multiple peers receives genuinely different filters from each. In the diagram, R receives {B, D, E} from B and {C, F} from C — two disjoint subtrees. When R needs to reach F, only C's filter matches. This is where bloom filters provide real candidate selection: a node with several peers can narrow the forwarding choice before consulting tree coordinates. Leaf nodes like D have only one peer, so their single inbound filter is necessarily near-complete (everything except themselves) and offers no selection — but leaf nodes have no choice to make anyway.

Bloom filter sizing (bit count and hash functions) requires further analysis based on actual deployment scenarios. The FMP wire format is versioned to accommodate future parameter changes as operational experience accumulates.

Routing Decisions

At each hop, FMP makes a local forwarding decision using the following priority chain:

1. Local delivery — the destination is this node
2. Direct peer — the destination is an authenticated neighbor
3. Bloom-guided candidate selection — bloom filters identify peers that can reach the destination; tree coordinates rank them by distance and link quality
4. Greedy routing — fallback when bloom filters haven't converged; forward to the peer that minimizes tree distance to the destination
5. No route — destination unreachable; send error signal to source

All multi-hop routing depends on knowing the destination's tree coordinates. These are cached at each node after being learned through discovery (LookupRequest/LookupResponse) or session establishment (SessionSetup). The coordinate cache is the critical piece that enables efficient forwarding.

Coordinate Caching and Discovery

When a node first needs to reach an unknown destination, it sends a LookupRequest that propagates through the network guided by bloom filters and loop prevention. The destination responds with its coordinates, which the source and intermediate nodes along the return path cache. Subsequent traffic routes efficiently using the cached coordinates.

Session establishment (SessionSetup) also carries coordinates, warming transit node caches along the path so that data packets can be forwarded without individual discovery at each hop.

Error Recovery

When routing fails — because cached coordinates are stale or a path has broken — transit nodes signal the source:

• CoordsRequired: A transit node lacks the destination's coordinates. The source re-initiates discovery and resets its coordinate warmup strategy.
• PathBroken: Greedy routing reached a dead end. The source re-discovers the destination's current coordinates.

Both signals trigger active recovery, and are rate-limited to prevent storms during topology changes.

See fips-mesh-operation.md for the complete routing and mesh behavior description.

Metrics Measurement Protocol (MMP)

Each peer link runs an instance of the Metrics Measurement Protocol, which measures link quality through in-band report exchange. MMP computes smoothed round-trip time (SRTT), packet loss rate, interarrival jitter, goodput, and one-way delay trend — all derived from counter and timestamp fields already present in the FMP wire format, with no additional probing traffic required.

MMP operates in three modes. Full mode exchanges both SenderReports and ReceiverReports to compute all metrics including RTT. Lightweight mode exchanges only ReceiverReports, providing loss and jitter but not RTT — useful for constrained links. Minimal mode disables reports entirely, relying only on spin bit and congestion echo flags in the frame header.

Reports are sent at RTT-adaptive intervals (clamped to 100 ms–2 s), so high-latency links don't generate excessive measurement traffic while low-latency links converge quickly. Each metric carries both short-term and long-term exponentially weighted moving averages, enabling detection of quality changes against a stable baseline.

MMP's primary role today is operator visibility — periodic log lines report per-link RTT, loss, jitter, and goodput. The metrics also provide the foundation for quality-aware routing: MMP computes an Expected Transmission Count (ETX) from bidirectional delivery ratios, which will feed into candidate ranking once link-cost routing is enabled.

See fips-mesh-layer.md for MMP operating modes, report scheduling, and the spin bit design.

---

Transport Abstraction

FIPS treats the communication medium as a pluggable component. Every transport — whether a UDP socket, an Ethernet interface, a Tor circuit, or a radio modem — implements the same simple interface: send a datagram to an address, receive datagrams, and report the link MTU. The rest of the protocol stack sees no difference between them.

A transport is a driver for a particular medium. A link is a peer connection established over a transport. Transport addresses (IP:port, MAC address, .onion) are opaque to all layers above FMP — they exist only to deliver datagrams and are discarded once FMP has authenticated the peer via the Noise IK handshake. From that point on, the peer is identified solely by its cryptographic identity.

Transports fall into three categories based on their connectivity model:

Category	Examples	Characteristics
Overlay	UDP/IP, Tor	Tunnels FIPS over existing networks
Shared medium	Ethernet, WiFi, Bluetooth, Radio	Local broadcast, peer discovery
Point-to-point	Serial, dialup	Fixed connections, no discovery

These categories differ in addressing, MTU, reliability, and whether they support local discovery, but FMP handles all of them uniformly. A node running multiple transports simultaneously bridges between those networks automatically — peers from all transports feed into a single spanning tree, and the router selects the best path regardless of which medium carries it. If one transport fails, traffic reroutes through alternatives without application involvement.

Some transports support an optional discovery capability — the ability to broadcast and listen for announcements indicating the availability of FIPS endpoints on the local medium. Shared media like Ethernet, WiFi, Bluetooth, and radio are natural fits for this, as they can reach nearby devices without prior configuration. When discovery is available, nodes can automatically find and peer with other FIPS nodes on the same medium. Transports that lack discovery (such as configured UDP endpoints) simply skip this step and connect directly to configured addresses. Additionally, endpoint discovery using Nostr relays and signed events is planned, allowing internet-reachable nodes to publish their transport addresses for other FIPS nodes to find.

NAT traversal is not currently addressed by the protocol. Internet-connected nodes behind NAT must be reachable through port forwarding, a publicly addressed peer, or relay through other mesh nodes. UDP hole punching and relay-assisted NAT traversal are potential future mechanisms but are not part of the current design.

Implementation status: UDP/IP is implemented. Ethernet and Bluetooth transports are under active design and development. All others are future directions.

See fips-transport-layer.md for the full transport layer specification.

---

Security

FIPS is designed around four classes of adversary, each addressed by a different layer of the protocol.

Transport Observers

A passive observer on the underlying transport — someone monitoring a WiFi network, tapping an Ethernet segment, or inspecting UDP traffic — sees only encrypted packets. The FMP link-layer Noise IK session encrypts all traffic between direct peers, including routing gossip and forwarded session datagrams. The observer can infer timing, packet sizes, and which transport endpoints are exchanging traffic, but cannot read content or determine FIPS-level node identities from the encrypted packets. Traffic analysis — correlating timing and volume patterns across multiple vantage points to infer communication relationships — is not defended against (see Specific Design Goals).

Active Attackers on the Transport

An adversary who can inject, modify, drop, or replay packets on the transport is also defeated by the FMP link-layer Noise IK session. Mutual authentication prevents impersonation, AEAD encryption detects tampering, and counter-based nonces with a sliding replay window reject replayed packets.

Other FIPS Nodes (Intermediate Routers)

The most important adversary class is the operators of other nodes in the mesh — the peers that forward your traffic. FIPS treats every intermediate router as potentially adversarial. The FSP session layer establishes a completely independent Noise IK session between the communicating endpoints, so intermediate nodes cannot read application payloads even though they decrypt and re-encrypt the link-layer envelope at each hop.

Routing headers expose only the destination's node_addr — an opaque SHA-256 hash of the actual public key. Intermediate routers can forward traffic without learning which Nostr identities are communicating. An observer can verify "does this node_addr belong to pubkey X?" if they already know the pubkey, but cannot enumerate communicating identities by inspecting routed traffic.

Entity	Can See
Transport observer	Encrypted packets, timing, packet sizes
Direct peer	Your npub, traffic volume, timing
Intermediate router	Source and destination node_addrs, packet size
Destination	Your npub, payload content

Adversarial Nodes Disrupting the Mesh

Beyond passive observation, a malicious node could attempt to disrupt routing by injecting false spanning tree announcements, advertising bogus bloom filters, or claiming invalid tree positions. FMP mitigates these through signed TreeAnnounce messages verified by direct peers, transitive ancestry chain validation, replay protection via sequence numbers, and discretionary peering — node operators choose who to peer with, so an attacker with many identities still needs real nodes to accept their connections. Handshake rate limiting further constrains how fast an attacker can establish new links. In fully open networks with automatic peer discovery, Sybil resistance relies primarily on rate limiting; discretionary peering provides stronger resistance in curated deployments where operators vet their peers. An attacker who controls all of a target node's direct peers can completely control its view of the network (an eclipse attack); diverse peering across independent operators and transports is the primary mitigation.

---

Prior Work

FIPS builds on proven designs rather than inventing new cryptography or routing algorithms. Nearly every major design decision has deployed precedent.

Spanning Tree Self-Organization

The idea that distributed nodes can build a spanning tree through purely local decisions — each node selecting a parent based on announcements from its neighbors — dates to the IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree Protocol (STP, 1985). STP demonstrated that a network-wide tree emerges from a simple deterministic rule (lowest bridge ID wins root election) applied independently at each node. FIPS uses the same principle — lowest node address determines the root — adapted from an Ethernet bridging context to a general-purpose overlay mesh.

Tree Coordinate Routing

The spanning tree coordinates, bloom filter candidate selection, and greedy routing algorithms are adapted from Yggdrasil v0.5 and its Ironwood routing library. Yggdrasil's key insight was using the tree path from root to node as a routable coordinate, enabling greedy forwarding without global routing tables. FIPS adapts these algorithms for multi-transport operation, Nostr identity integration, and constrained MTU environments.

The theoretical foundation for greedy routing on tree embeddings draws on Kleinberg's work on navigable small-world networks, which showed that greedy forwarding succeeds in O(log² n) steps when the network has hierarchical structure. Thorup-Zwick compact routing schemes separately demonstrated that sublinear routing state is achievable with bounded stretch, motivating the use of tree coordinates rather than full routing tables.

Split-Horizon Bloom Filter Propagation

FIPS distributes reachability information using bloom filters computed with a split-horizon rule: when advertising to a peer, exclude that peer's own contributions. This technique is borrowed from distance-vector routing protocols — RIP (1988) and Babel use split-horizon to prevent routing loops by not advertising a route back to the neighbor it was learned from. FIPS applies the same principle to probabilistic set advertisements rather than distance-vector tables.

Cryptographic Identity as Network Address

FIPS nodes are identified by their Nostr public keys (secp256k1). The network address is the cryptographic identity — there is no separate address assignment or registration step. CJDNS pioneered this approach in overlay meshes, deriving IPv6 addresses from the double-SHA-512 of each node's public key. Tor .onion addresses and the IETF Host Identity Protocol (HIP) follow the same principle. FIPS uses Nostr's existing key infrastructure rather than introducing a new identity scheme.

Dual-Layer Encryption

FIPS encrypts traffic twice: FMP provides hop-by-hop link encryption (protecting against transport-layer observers), while FSP provides independent end-to-end session encryption (protecting against intermediate FIPS nodes). This layered approach mirrors Tor, where each relay peels one layer of encryption (hop-by-hop) while the innermost layer protects end-to-end payload. I2P uses a similar garlic routing scheme with tunnel-layer and end-to-end encryption. Unlike Tor and I2P, FIPS does not provide anonymity — its dual encryption protects confidentiality and integrity rather than hiding traffic patterns.

Noise Protocol Framework

Both FMP link encryption and FSP session encryption use the Noise Protocol Framework IK handshake pattern. Noise IK provides mutual authentication with a single round trip, where the initiator knows the responder's static key in advance. WireGuard uses the same IK base pattern (extended with a pre-shared key as IKpsk2) for VPN tunnels. The Lightning Network uses Noise XK, a related pattern where the initiator's static key is transmitted in a third message rather than the first, providing stronger initiator identity hiding. FIPS uses pure Noise IK at two independent layers, sharing the same framework and cryptographic foundation as these deployed systems while choosing the pattern that best fits its mutual-authentication requirement.

Index-Based Session Dispatch

FIPS uses locally-assigned 32-bit session indices to demultiplex incoming packets to the correct cryptographic session in O(1) time, without parsing source addresses or performing expensive lookups. This directly follows WireGuard's receiver index approach, where each peer assigns a random index during handshake and the remote side includes it in every packet header.

Transport-Agnostic Overlay Mesh

FIPS is designed to operate over any datagram-capable transport — UDP, raw Ethernet, Bluetooth, radio, serial — through a uniform transport abstraction. Several mesh overlays have demonstrated transport-agnostic design: CJDNS runs over UDP and Ethernet, Yggdrasil supports TCP and TLS transports, and Tor can use pluggable transports to tunnel through various media. FIPS extends this pattern to shared-medium transports (radio, BLE) with per-transport MTU and discovery capabilities.

Metrics Measurement Protocol

MMP's design assembles well-established measurement techniques into a unified per-link protocol. The SenderReport/ReceiverReport exchange structure follows RTCP (RFC 3550), which uses the same report pairing for media stream quality monitoring in RTP sessions. MMP's jitter computation uses the RTCP interarrival jitter algorithm directly.

The smoothed RTT estimator uses the Jacobson/Karels algorithm (RFC 6298), the same SRTT computation used in TCP for retransmission timeout calculation since 1988. MMP derives RTT from timestamp-echo in ReceiverReports with dwell-time compensation, rather than from packet round-trips.

The spin bit in the FMP frame header follows the QUIC spin bit (RFC 9312) — a single bit that alternates each round trip, enabling passive latency measurement. FIPS implements the spin bit state machine but relies on timestamp-echo for SRTT, as irregular mesh traffic makes spin bit RTT unreliable.

The Expected Transmission Count (ETX) metric, computed from bidirectional delivery ratios, was introduced by De Couto et al. (2003) for wireless mesh routing and is used in protocols including OLSR and Babel. FIPS computes ETX per-link from MMP loss measurements for future use in candidate ranking.

The CE (Congestion Experienced) echo flag reserves space for ECN signaling, following the TCP/IP ECN echo pattern (RFC 3168).

Cryptographic Primitives

FIPS reuses Nostr's cryptographic stack — secp256k1 for identity keys, Schnorr signatures for authentication, SHA-256 for hashing, and ChaCha20-Poly1305 for authenticated encryption. This is the same primitive set used across Bitcoin, Nostr, and a growing ecosystem of self-sovereign identity systems. No novel cryptography is introduced.

---

Further Reading

Protocol Layers

Document	Description
fips-transport-layer.md	Transport layer: abstraction, types, services provided to FMP
fips-mesh-layer.md	FMP: peer authentication, link encryption, forwarding
fips-session-layer.md	FSP: end-to-end encryption, session lifecycle
fips-ipv6-adapter.md	IPv6 adaptation: DNS, TUN interface, MTU enforcement

Mesh Behavior and Wire Formats

Document	Description
fips-mesh-operation.md	How the mesh operates: routing, discovery, error recovery
fips-wire-formats.md	Complete wire format reference for all protocol layers

Supporting References

Document	Description
fips-spanning-tree.md	Spanning tree algorithms and data structures
fips-bloom-filters.md	Bloom filter parameters, math, and computation
spanning-tree-dynamics.md	Scenario walkthroughs: convergence, partitions, recovery

Implementation

Document	Description
fips-software-architecture.md	Stable architectural decisions guiding the codebase
fips-state-machines.md	Phase-based state machine pattern (Rust)
fips-configuration.md	YAML configuration reference

External References

• IEEE 802.1D Spanning Tree Protocol
• Yggdrasil Network
• Yggdrasil v0.5 Release Notes
• Ironwood Routing Library
• Kleinberg — The Small-World Phenomenon
• CJDNS
• Tor Project
• I2P
• Host Identity Protocol (HIP)
• Babel Routing Protocol
• Noise Protocol Framework
• WireGuard
• WireGuard Whitepaper
• Lightning Network BOLT #8 — Transport
• QUIC (RFC 9000)
• QUIC Spin Bit (RFC 9312)
• RTCP (RFC 3550)
• TCP SRTT / RTO (RFC 6298)
• ECN (RFC 3168)
• ETX — De Couto et al. 2003
• OLSR
• Nostr Protocol